 |
 |
|
 |
|||||||||||||||
 |
|||||||
|
 |
EILEEN ALT POWELL Associated Press / The Star-Ledger Wednesday May 17, 2006 - It's no secret that baby boomers have not been very diligent about saving for retirement, but that doesn't mean they don't have assets. Many live in homes that have appreciated greatly in value in recent years as real estate prices have soared. Some financial experts believe that's going to be the boomers' salvation because they will be able to tap that home equity to help fund their retirements. The main sources of retiree income traditionally have been Social Security benefits, pensions, savings and working during retirement. "But fewer people are getting pensions, and many haven't saved enough," said Gillette Edmunds, co-author with financial planner Jim Keene of the newly published "Retire on the House." Keene, a regional manager in private client services for San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co., added that baby boomers will have a number of options to "monetize" their homes, from buying a less-expensive house or condominium for cash and investing the proceeds, to reverse mortgage loans or interfamily deals. Because these can be complicated transactions, it's best to get professional help in deciding what to do and in executing the deals, Keene said. To be sure, there are mortgage experts who are skeptical of putting too much faith in tapping home equity to fund retirement. "If somebody has no savings, the chances are they don't own a million dollar house free and clear either," said Michael Moskowitz, the president of the New York mortgage company Equity Now. "I think it's a bit of wishful thinking." He added: "Without retirement planning, without a 401(k) or IRA savings account, people aren't going to be able to enjoy the same standard of living they had before retirement." Edmunds and Keene do, in fact, urge people to save for retirement. But their point is that many may not have thought about using the equity they've built up in their homes to supplement other retirement income. The easiest way to free up that equity is, of course, to sell the house. At that point, the retirees can "downsize" to a smaller home or condominium or they can start renting. They then can invest the excess proceeds from the sale and tap the earnings to supplement their income. "You want to invest this money carefully," Edmunds said. "You certainly don't want to take a big windfall from your house and blow it." Another alternative, he said, is to rent out rooms. In some cases, he said, it might even make sense to split the entire house into rental units. "This is a very personal decision," he added. "A lot of people aren't comfortable about having tenants or don't want to cut house into (rental) units." Keene points out that there are a variety of ways retirees can tap the equity in their homes without selling them outright. The most common alternative is the "reverse" mortgage, which can provide a lump sum or fixed monthly payments to borrowers who are at least 62 years old, but ideally more than 70 years old. The downside is that these loans currently have high upfront costs and limited payouts. But there are also a variety of modern mortgage products that retirees can consider, especially if they have strong credit ratings, he said. These include: _ A fixed term, interest-only home equity line of credit. _ A negative amortization loan, such as an option payment adjustable rate mortgage. _ An interfamily loan, using a binding agreement structured like a mortgage. _ Private trusts. |
|||||
|
|||||||
